Saturday, November 15th, 2008 at SF City Hall…

The outrage spread from city wide to nation wide today as 100s of cities and 10s of 1000s of people around the world collectively protested California’s November 4th passing of Proposition 8, which again limits the sanctity of marriage to 1 man and 1 woman.

So on November 5th, many California counties stopped issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. As a result, numerous protests have occurred around the state including dozens in The Bay Area and SoCal sectors.

The back-and-forth definition of domestic partnerships and same-sex marriages has been fought in local and state court chambers for over 3 decades. The heart of this battleground has consistently been Our Fair City of San Francisco.
It is a widely — and understandably so — a very personal issue for many of our fellow residents. For our same-sex friends and Loyal Readers, it has been a long and winding road.

Prior to 1977, the California Civil Code defined marriage as “a personal relation arising out of a civil context, to which consent of the parties making that contract is necessary.” Related wording made vague references to gender, thus later that year the legislature amended the definition of marriage to remove any ambiguity and truly restrict the definition to that “1 man and 1 woman.”

In 2002, voters amended the state constitution via Proposition 22, which in effect stated that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

In February of 2004, Mayor Gavin Newsom reacted to President Bush’s statement to support a constitutional ammendment banning same-sex marriages by opening the doors of City Hall and performing over 4000 weddings in less than a month. The weddings were halted on March 12th by The California Supreme Court who ultimately annulled the marriages on August 12th.

On May 15th of the year current, the California Supreme Court struck down Prop 22, again giving same-sex couples the right to legally marry. By June, the City Clerk began recognizing civil unions to any and all who made and appointment, paid $82, and said “I do” – regardless of gender.

For almost six months, the marriages continued. But with the narrow passing of Prop 8 two weeks ago, the state constitution was re-amended to re-restrict the definition of marriage to a union between a man and a woman. Again.
The official ballot title language for Proposition 8 was “Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry.” The actual wording added to the constitution now reads: “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

More information here.
Two-week hindsight/next steps here.
Protest tracker here.
Civic Center’s coverage here.